Meta Values — What Actually Runs You
🧠 The one line to hold
Not with a crystal ball. With arithmetic. Your time, your energy and your money flow in proportion to your values every day, and that accumulation is your destiny.
📖 What a meta value is
A meta value is not the everyday value people claim when asked. It is not the list you would recite — faith, family, fitness — if someone put you on the spot. Those are slogans, and slogans are easy to say.
Your meta values operate underneath that, in the quiet recesses of the mind, and they govern how you experience everything around you. They are unconscious, they are ranked, and they decide what you notice, what you remember, what you find time for and what you never quite get to.
You do not choose them by deciding. You discover them by looking at evidence.
⚖️ Stated versus demonstrated
This distinction is the whole game.
What you say you value can be manipulated — by you — to look how you would like it to look. What your life demonstrates cannot. You can claim you value cooking. If you do not cook, you value the idea of cooking.
So the instrument in this course does not ask what you believe about yourself. It asks where your finite resources actually went. Show me your calendar and your bank account, and I will show you what you actually value.
🪜 Why only the top few ever show up
Your values sit in a hierarchy, and your time, energy and money are spent from the top down. They run dry before they reach the bottom. In practice only your top three to five ever manifest in your life at all.
This is why the ranking matters more than the list. A value ranked seventh may as well not exist — not because you do not care, but because nothing is left by the time your resources get there.
🕳️ Where the ranking comes from
Your hierarchy of values reflects a hierarchy of voids. Whatever you perceived as most missing became what you most search for. Your biggest perceived gaps became your highest values.
👧 Simple Version
📚 Where this comes from
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. A meta value is best described as…
2. Roughly how many of your values actually manifest in life?
3. Which cannot be manipulated to look how you'd like?
4. "If I know your meta values I can tell you your future" works by…
5. The hierarchy of values reflects a hierarchy of…
The Thirteen Questions
🧠 Before you write a word
Three answers to each of thirteen questions. Thirty-nine data points, pulled from the evidence of your own life.
You will notice the same answers surfacing across questions that have nothing to do with each other. That is not you being repetitive — that repetition is your values surfacing. It is the entire signal. Do not vary your answers to avoid it.
📏 Four rules
- Three answers each, no blanks. Thirty-nine is the minimum for the pattern to appear.
- Never write what it should be. Not ought to be, not hope to be. What it is, today.
- Stuck? Ask someone who knows you. A spouse or close friend will name it instantly — others often see us more clearly than we see ourselves.
- If a question makes you squirm, that struggle is the data. Stay a detective, not a judge.
✍️ Answer them here
Everything saves as you type and syncs to your other devices. Come back as often as you like — the instrument sharpens each pass.
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. How many data points does the full instrument produce?
2. The same answer appearing across unrelated questions means…
3. If a question makes you squirm, that struggle is…
4. When you're stuck on a question, the fix is…
5. You should write what your life…
Score It — Find Your Meta Values
🧠 The rule that makes it yours
That is why it survives your own skepticism. There is no algorithm to distrust and no expert to take on faith. There is only your handwriting, counted.
🔢 How the scoring works
Among your thirty-nine answers there will be repetition — perhaps a great deal of it. You may be expressing the same value in different ways: "spending time with people I like," "having a drink with the folks from work," "going out to eat with friends." Those are not three values. They are one, said three ways.
- Group the answers that are really the same value.
- Count how often each one repeats.
- Rank them, most frequent first.
- Keep the top three to five. That is your hierarchy.
The grouping step is the one that decides everything, and it is judgment rather than procedure. Get it wrong and you split one strong value into three weak ones, and the hierarchy you derive is not yours.
🚫 Read your answers back first
The biggest threat to this is not a wrong answer. It is a dishonest one you believe is honest. Before you group anything, walk back through what you wrote:
- Time — did you refuse to count hours at work you dislike? Those hours serve a value too.
- Energy — did you name the energy you wish you had? A true high value renews you; it does not drain you.
- Money — "those are just bills." You signed up for them. There is a driver underneath.
- Order — "I'm not disciplined at all" is a judgment, usually borrowed from someone else's standard. Everyone keeps one domain in order.
- Goals — a goal that never materialised was not yours. It was injected from outside. Feedback, not a flaw.
- Learning — the brand-new interest spikes and fades. Filter for what has stood the test of time.
🧮 Your tally
Every answer you wrote, counted by exact wording — so this is a rough hint, not a result. Type a group name beside answers that mean the same thing and their counts merge, which is the step that turns wording into meaning.
🏆 Your Power Code
Three to five, highest first. Most people land on three or four — leave the rest blank. Your working hierarchy now lives beside your goal and connections in one place.
💵 One line worth sitting with
Landed on eight or twelve and cannot get to five? Normal for a first pass. Most people are cloudy the first time and sharpen each run. Come back in ninety days.
👧 Simple Version
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. Three answers that all describe socialising should be…
2. The biggest threat to the result is…
3. Grouping badly will…
4. If money is not at the top of your hierarchy, it means…
5. "I'm not disciplined at all" is…
Why Your Goals Keep Slipping
🧠 The one line to hold
🎭 The benefit without the cost
When you say you want something and never do it, the reason is usually this: you want the benefit without the cost.
"I want a business" often means "I want the money and the freedom, not the pain of building it." So the moment it becomes painful, you stop — and then you call that a discipline problem.
For the things genuinely high in your values you take both, the pain and the pleasure, in equal measure. Like a parent with a child: it is hard, it is joyful, and you never turn your back on it. You do not need to be talked into it.
📉 The ceiling nobody explains
There is a second mechanism worth knowing. Your results tend to settle at the level you believe you deserve. Your self-worth does not rise to meet the money; you bring the money back down to meet your self-worth.
You have probably lived it — a stretch where things climbed past your normal, then an unexpected bill, a deal that died, or a quiet stall that brought it back. That is not bad luck. It is a setting.
🔀 Your two honest options
- Change the goal so it matches your values. Perfectly legitimate, and often the right answer. A goal that was never yours is not worth ten years of forcing.
- Change the relationship between the goal and your values — link the goal to what you already care about most, until pursuing it stops feeling like a fight.
The second is what the next module is for.
👧 Simple Version
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. A goal you keep dropping is…
2. "I want a business" often really means…
3. For a genuinely high value you accept…
4. Your two honest options are change the goal, or change…
5. How many times did the masterclass explain how to raise the setpoint?
Re-myelination & The Power of 200
🧠 The one line to hold
🔬 What re-myelination is
Myelin is the insulating sheath around a nerve fibre. As a pathway is used repeatedly, myelin thickens around it, and the signal travels faster and with less effort. Behaviours that feel effortless in high performers are behaviours whose pathways are heavily myelinated.
So the claim behind the exercise is this: write enough genuine connections between your goal and your highest values, and you are not merely persuading yourself — you are laying down the pathway that makes pursuing it automatic. Repetition insulates. Insulation makes it effortless.
✍️ The question you answer 200 times
Two hundred sounds absurd. That is the point.
- The first 20 come easily.
- Somewhere around 70 to 100 it gets hard.
- Past 140 is a genuine stretch — and that stretch is the actual work.
The difficulty is not an obstacle to the method. The difficulty is the method. You will know it is working when you catch yourself doing the thing without resentment.
Values → Goal → Connections
Your hierarchy, the goal it is carrying, and every reason they belong together — one working view.
☀️ Daily Alignment
Use the same Power Code every morning and evening: choose priority actions, connect them to what matters, then measure what actually moved.
🌅 Morning · design the day
Choose no more than three actions. Calendar them, connect each to a value, and anticipate what could derail it.
🌙 Evening · read the evidence
No verdicts. Capture feedback, gratitude, and the next adjustment.
⭐ Turn today into a Power of 200 connection
Write one honest reason your goal or today’s action serves a meta value. It is added to the same 200-list above; pin it if it belongs in your strongest 20.
Accountability · last 14 days
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. Myelin makes a neural pathway…
2. Where did the presenter say he got his re-myelination explanation?
3. The question you answer 200 times is…
4. Why must the links be written by hand?
5. You'll know it's working when you do the thing…
The Daily Practice
🧠 The one line to hold
Values are dynamic. As you perceive new voids they shift. So you run this on a rhythm, not once.
🌅 Morning — design, do not drift
Before the inbox takes the wheel, choose up to three high-priority actions, link each one to a meta value, calendar it, and plan around the most likely obstacle.
🌙 Evening — feedback, not judgment
Measure which actions were completed, what worked, what did not, how to improve tomorrow, how the day moved the goal, and three specific gratitudes. Then turn the day’s clearest lesson into another Power of 200 connection.
🚨 The four triggers
The method publishes no trigger list; these four are drawn from the mechanisms it does describe. Each tells you something different.
| Trigger | What it looks like | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Charge | Someone disturbs a space or system of yours and you are genuinely upset. | A high value being violated. The size of the charge ranks it. |
| 🪫 Drain | Energy drops mid-task; you keep putting it off. | A low value — not a character defect. Link it or delegate it. |
| 📉 Setpoint | Results climb, then a bill or a dead deal pulls them back. | The self-worth ceiling doing its work. |
| 😤 Resentment | You do it, but with a chip on your shoulder. | The goal is still ranked too low. Keep linking. |
🔧 What to do with a drain
This is the most misread of the four. "I'm bad at the paperwork / the finances / the follow-up" is almost never a character defect. It is a low-ranked value — which means try harder is the one move guaranteed to fail.
- Link it — run the Power of 200 on it until it connects to something high on your list.
- Delegate it — hand it to someone whose hierarchy already ranks it high.
🔁 Re-run it
Every ninety to a hundred and twenty days, run the thirteen questions again. You will start cloudy and sharpen each time, and watching your own hierarchy move as you do the work is its own kind of proof.
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. The morning question asks for the highest-priority action that…
2. "I'm bad at the finances" is best read as…
3. The two moves that work on a drain are link it, or…
4. How often should you re-run the thirteen questions?
5. Resentment falling over time means…
The Wealth Framework
🧠 The one line to hold
💠 The three components of wealth
Wealth is not one thing, and people who conflate them stay stuck. Demartini's teaching separates it into three:
| Component | What it is |
|---|---|
| Earning | What comes in. Most people's entire attention lives here, which is why raising income so often changes nothing. |
| Managing | What you do with it once it arrives — recording, allocating, deciding. This is where wealth is actually built or lost. |
| Building | What you put to work so it earns without you. Assets rather than income. |
A rise in earning with no change in managing produces a rise in spending. That is the whole story of most raises.
🪜 The six steps to wealth
- Know your numbers. Assets, liabilities, and the difference between them. You cannot manage what you have not counted.
- Pay yourself first. A fixed portion off the top, before anything else has a claim on it.
- Save it forcibly, not optionally. Automatic and out of reach beats disciplined and available.
- Raise the portion over time. The percentage climbs as your capacity climbs, so lifestyle never absorbs the whole gain.
- Move savings into assets. Idle money is not wealth; it is a decision you have not made yet.
- Give it a purpose above yourself. Money attached to a mission behaves differently from money attached to comfort.
🧾 Your numbers
Step one, done properly. Rough figures beat no figures — you are looking for the direction and the gap, not audit precision.
👧 Simple Version
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. The three components of wealth are earning, building and…
2. A rise in earning with no change in managing produces…
3. Step one of the six steps is…
4. "Pay yourself first" means the portion comes…
5. Idle savings are described as…
Where Money Actually Ranks For You
🧠 The one line to hold
🔍 The diagnosis
Module 7 gave you the framework. This module answers why frameworks fail.
If the financial side of your life is the part you avoid, you already know the standard advice: be more disciplined, use a better app, try harder. You have probably tried all three and returned to the same place. That is not a failure of character. It is a low-ranked value behaving exactly as a low-ranked value behaves.
Look at what happens: your energy drops when you open the books. You reschedule it. You do the parts that are visible to other people and not the parts that are only visible to you. Those are the fingerprints of the drain trigger, and no amount of resolve rewrites a ranking.
🔀 So you have two moves, and only two
| Move | When it's right | What it costs |
|---|---|---|
| Link it | When the work genuinely must be yours — you are the one accountable, or the judgment cannot be handed over. | The Power of 200, run on money specifically. Slow, and it works. |
| Delegate it | When someone else's hierarchy already ranks it high, and the accountability can sit with you while the doing sits with them. | Money, and the discipline to review what comes back. |
Most people need both: delegate the execution, link the oversight. What you cannot do is neither — that is how the avoided thing stays avoided for another decade.
🔗 Link money to your hierarchy
Same mechanism as the My Power Code workspace, aimed at one target. The question: how does understanding and managing my money serve this value?
🧭 The delegation decision
👧 Simple Version
📝 Quiz — 5/5 to complete
1. Avoiding the financial side is best explained as…
2. The two moves available are link it or…
3. Most people need…
4. "The finances" is a poor target because…
5. Which trigger's fingerprints show up around avoided money work?